.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

2Physics Quote:
"Many of the molecules found by ROSINA DFMS in the coma of comet 67P are compatible with the idea that comets delivered key molecules for prebiotic chemistry throughout the solar system and in particular to the early Earth increasing drastically the concentration of life-related chemicals by impact on a closed water body. The fact that glycine was most probably formed on dust grains in the presolar stage also makes these molecules somehow universal, which means that what happened in the solar system could probably happen elsewhere in the Universe."
-- Kathrin Altwegg and the ROSINA Team

(Read Full Article: "Glycine, an Amino Acid and Other Prebiotic Molecules in Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko"

Saturday, June 27, 2009

Quantum Mechanical Effects in Ordinary Objects: Nanomechanics Coupled to Qubits

Michael L. Roukes of California Institute of Technology [photo credit: Pasi Jalkanen, University of Jyväskylä, Finland]

In a paper recently published in 'Nature', a team of scientists led by Michael Roukes of Caltech reported an interesting experiment coupling a superconducting qubit to a nanomechanical resonator -- which could provide a good insight into the quantum-mechanical behavior in ordinary objects.

At the quantum level, the atoms that make up matter and the photons that make up light behave in a number of seemingly bizarre ways. Particles can exist in "superposition", in more than one state at the same time (as long as we don't 'observe'), a situation that permitted Schrödinger's famed cat to be simultaneously alive and dead; matter can be "entangled" — Albert Einstein called it "spooky action at a distance" — such that one thing influences another thing, regardless of how far apart the two are.

Matt LaHaye

Previously, scientists have successfully measured entanglement and superposition in photons and in small collections of just a few atoms. But physicists have long wondered if larger collections of atoms — those that form objects with sizes closer to what we are familiar with in our day-to-day life — also exhibit quantum effects. [Read 'entanglement' related articles in 2Physics category: Quantum Computation & Communication].

"Atoms and photons are intrinsically quantum mechanical, so it's no surprise if they behave in quantum mechanical ways. The question is, do these larger collections of atoms do this as well," says Matt LaHaye, the lead author of the paper.

Keith Schwab [photo courtesy: kschwabresearch.com]

Keith Schwab, co-author of the paper, added,"It'd be weird to think of ordinary matter behaving in a quantum way, but there's no reason it shouldn't. If single particles are quantum mechanical, then collections of particles should also be quantum mechanical. And if that's not the case — if the quantum mechanical behavior breaks down — that means there's some kind of new physics going on that we don't understand."

The tricky part, however is devising an experiment that can detect quantum mechanical behavior in such ordinary objects — without, for example, those effects being interfered with or even destroyed by the experiment itself. Now, however, LaHaye, Schwab, Roukes, and their colleagues have developed a new tool that meets such fastidious demands and that can be used to search for quantum effects in an ordinary object.

In their experiment, the Caltech scientists used microfabrication techniques to create a very tiny nanoelectromechanical system (NEMS) resonator, a silicon-nitride beam — just 2 micrometers long, 0.2 micrometers wide, and weighing 40 billionths of a milligram — that can resonate, or flex back and forth, at a high frequency when a voltage is applied.

A small distance (300 nanometers, or 300 billionths of a meter) from the resonator, the scientists fabricated a second nanoscale device known as a single-Cooper-pair box, or superconducting "qubit" (a qubit is the basic unit of quantum information).

Scanning electron micrograph of a superconducting qubit in close proximity to a nanomechanical resonator. The nanoresonator is the bilayer (silicon nitride/aluminum) beam spanning the length of the trench in the center of the image; the qubit is the aluminum island located to the left of the nanoresonator. An aluminum electrode, located adjacent to the nanoresonator on the right, is used to actuate and sense the nanoresonator's motion. [Image credit: Junho Suh. Electron beam lithography was performed by Richard Muller at Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Nanoresonator etch was performed by Junho Suh in the Roukes Lab.]

The superconducting qubit is essentially an island formed between two insulating barriers across which a set of paired electrons can travel. In the Caltech experiments, the qubit has only two quantized energy states: the ground state and an excited state. This energy state can be controlled by applying microwave radiation, which creates an electric field.

Because the NEMS resonator and the qubit are fabricated so closely together, their behavior is tightly linked; this allows the NEMS resonator to be used as a probe for the energy quantization of the qubit. "When the qubit is excited, the NEMS bridge vibrates at a higher frequency than it does when the qubit is in the ground state", LaHaye says.

One of the most exciting aspects of this work is that this same coupling should also enable measurements to observe the discrete energy levels of the vibrating resonator that are predicted by quantum mechanics, the scientists say. This will require that the present experiment be turned around (so to speak), with the qubit used to probe the NEMS resonator. This could also make possible demonstrations of nanomechanical quantum superpositions and Einstein's spooky entanglement

"Quantum jumps are, perhaps, the archetypal signature of behavior governed by quantum effects," says Michael Roukes. "To see these requires us to engineer a special kind of interaction between our measurement apparatus and the object being measured. Matt's results establish a practical and really intriguing way to make this happen."

"Nanomechanical measurements of a superconducting qubit",
M. D. LaHaye, J. Suh, P. M. Echternach, K. C. Schwab, M. L. Roukes,
Nature 459, 960-964 (18 June 2009).

[We thank Media Relations, Caltech for materials used in this posting]

Labels: ,


Post a Comment